Which aspect of writing can be evaluated through peer review?

The chosen answer focuses on the evaluation of key components essential to effective writing, particularly in an academic or formal context. Clarity refers to how well the ideas are communicated; coherence assesses the logical flow of those ideas; argument strength examines the persuasiveness and support behind the writer's claims; and adherence to the prompt checks if the writing meets the intended assignment criteria. Peer review is an effective tool for assessing these aspects, as peers can provide constructive feedback on how well the writing fulfills its purpose and engages with its audience.

Other options, while potentially relevant to the overall discussion of writing, do not directly pertain to the critical evaluation components addressed in peer review. The personality of the writer, for instance, is subjective and less relevant in assessing the components of effective communication. Complex vocabulary alone doesn’t guarantee effective writing if it compromises clarity or coherence. Lastly, a personal writing style may vary from one writer to another, but peer reviews focus more substantially on the functional aspects of the writing rather than personal flair.